Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
Rowland Mens Performance Trousers Regular - Navy
  • Size Chart
  • Measuring Guide
  • Inches
  • CM

Inches

Size Chest Waist Leg (S) Leg (R) Leg (L)
XS 34 30 29 31 33
S 37 32 29 31 33
M 40 34 29 31 33
L 43 36 29 31 33
XL 46 38 29 31 33
XXL 49 40 29 31 33
3XL 52 42 29 31 33
4XL 55 44 29 31 33
5XL 58 46 29 31 33
6XL 61 48 29 31 33

CM

Size Chest Waist Leg (S) Leg (R) Leg (L)
XS 86 77 73 79 84
S 94 82 73 79 84
M 102 87 73 79 84
L 110 92 73 79 84
XL 118 97 73 79 84
XXL 126 102 73 79 84
3XL 134 107 73 79 84
4XL 142 112 73 79 84
5XL 150 117 73 79 84
6XL 156 122 73 79 84
Chest
Measure around your chest, holding the tape measure under your armpit.
Waist
Measure around your waist at the narrowest point.
Inside leg
From standing position, measure from your crotch to your ankle.

Overall rating: 4.261044 / 5 from 249 reviews.

AI Generated Review Summary

These lightweight trousers are praised for their quick-drying fabric, comfortable fit, and practical pockets. Customers appreciate the good looks and light weight, though opinions on the material and size vary.

Summary topics

  • Drying Speed (2%): Customers expressed appreciation for the great fit and fast drying of the product. (7 out of 20 reviews)
  • Product Feel (3%): Customers keep praising the great feel of the product, mentioning its quality, fit, and durability.
  • Product Appearance (5%): Customers expressed appreciation for the great look of the product, which was mentioned multiple times in the reviews.
  • Product Fit (38%): A significant amount of customers expressed appreciation for the good fit of the trousers, mentioning it multiple times.
  • Customer Service (5%): Customers keep praising the excellent service provided by the company, which was mentioned multiple times in the reviews.

Review topics: ["size","fit","length","colour","weight","fabric","material","problems","pockets","looks","style","feels","cut","shorts","pants","trousers","pair","drying","summer","price","clothing","dealt","jeans","wear","ironing","hesitation","wash"].

Review highlights

  • "Good fit, quality material and great value." — Jim T.
  • "The trousers were a perfect fit and good quality material" — Luba W.
  • "Great fit, comfy, looks good and lightweight" — Steve C.

Reviews

Good summer walking trousers. Bargain

"Good summer walking trousers. Bargain price"

— Stephen H. (5/5)

Wasn't sure of the material,

"Wasn't sure of the material, but will be great in the rain walking the dogs."

— Jon K. (4/5)

"Good quality and fit."

— David (5/5)

First pair arrived size on

"First pair arrived size on lable was wrong so had to return them customer service was very helpful & agreed to send out 2 prs of different sizes at no cost to me, when they arrived lable this time matched the size so sending back larger ones , shame they didn’t come with a belt."

— Craig B. (4/5)

Excellent fit and value for

"Excellent fit and value for money. Comfortable. Keeps me warm without overheating. Pretty good with rain too."

— Steven P. (5/5)

Dont like the fastening at

"Dont like the fastening at the top of the trousers"

— Paul C. (3/5)

Very pleased with cut and

"Very pleased with cut and material. Wish custom leg length was available."

— Graham B. (5/5)

All good comfortable fit, suits

"All good comfortable fit, suits my needs"

— Richard W. (5/5)

Missed the Tog24 logo on

"Missed the Tog24 logo on the trousers. My others had it on."

— Glynn W. (5/5)

too small, terrible quality

"too small, terrible quality"

— Cliff S. (1/5)

Q&A

>